City Council Minutes
Home > Government > City Council > City Council Minutes
CITY OF VICTORIA
WORKSHOP CITY COUNCIL MEETING
FEBRUARY 22, 2010
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7951 ROSE
VICTORIA, MINNESOTA
MINUTES
(1) CALL TO ORDER:
Pursuant to due call and posted notice
thereof, the City Council Workshop of the Victoria City Council was called
to order at 5:00 p.m. by Mayor Hershberger Thun in the Council Chambers at
7951 Rose.
(1) ROLL CALL:
Present: Mayor: Mary Hershberger
Thun; Councilmembers: Tim Amundsen, Tom O'Connor, Jim Paulsen and Kim
Roden.
Absent: None.
Staff Present: Don Uram, City Administrator; Holly
Kreft, Community Development Director; Cara Geheren, City Engineer; Mike
Norton, City Attorney and Ann Mahnke, Public Works Director.
Others Present: Sue Orsen, The
Victoria Gazette, Unsie Zuege, The Chanhassen Villager;
Recording Secretary Tanya Schmieg and others.
(2) ADOPT AGENDA:
A. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
Ms. Kreft provided an update of the Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District programs. She said the presentation will include the
land conservation program, capital improvement program, Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District lakes TMDL, regulatory program, public participation
and governance, finance and budgeting.
Ms. Kreft explained the purpose and intent of the land
conservation program.
Ms. Kreft showed a map of the key conservation areas.
She said the area in green is the key conservation areas which are
significant portions of the city. The purple hatched area is the metro
conservation corridors.
Ms. Kreft referred to the Marsh-Wassermann Corridor
Plan and noted there is a letter in the packet that clarified that the
plan was mislabeled and the intent was to have a study to review
development scenarios. She said in 2003 the city did a master plan for the
south side annexation area. In 2004 an alternative urban area wide review
was done as well as the comprehensive plan amendment to the 2020
comprehensive plan. Ms. Kreft said the blue and green areas on the 2004
comprehensive plan amendment future land use map are meant to be
preserved.
Ms. Kreft explained that the Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District is looking at purchasing parcels. She said that portions would be
placed into permanent conservation and upland would be sold off for
development potentially with restrictions. She noted that appraisals have
been completed for two parcels and negotiations are ongoing.
Ms. Kreft showed the map of the southwest regional
trail alignment.
Ms. Kreft reviewed scenario 3 which is the study that
has been recommended as an option. She noted the district board has not
approved the study. The areas in green are proposed to be preserved and
the areas in yellow are proposed to be developed.
Mr. Uram asked what the calculations are on open
space. Ms. Geheren stated the green area is about 90 acres and the total
acreage of the four parcels is approximately 170. Councilmember O'Connor
clarified that with the city's approach the total is also 170. Ms. Kreft
noted that this does not include parkland dedication.
Mayor Hershberger Thun asked about the approval. Ms.
Kreft said that the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District staff indicated
they would work with the city to extend the sewer. She said a permit would
still be needed from the city and the City Council would still need to
approve everything.
Councilmember O'Connor asked about the assessment. Ms.
Kreft explained that the city pays for the over-sizing cost and the
developer pays for the base cost. She noted that benefit would have to be
shown to the person assessed.
Councilmember Paulsen commented on the Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District never talking about development costs in the study. Mr.
Uram said if they do pursue development more would have to be done on the
financial side.
Councilmember Amundsen asked if a copy of the records
for the recent transactions has been published. Ms. Kreft said no.
Councilmember Amundsen said the district bought land in Minnetrista and
Minnetonka and that process should be compared. Councilmember O'Connor
asked about the size of the land in Minnetrista. Ms. Kreft said it was
less than 10 acres. Mr. Uram said the property in Minnetonka was around
$1.1 million.
Councilmember Paulsen asked about the response of the
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District wanting to purchase land. Ms. Kreft
said that part of their program is to protect habitat and preserve water
quality. Councilmember O'Connor said the city has the same objective. He
stated there is so much unknown.
Councilmember Roden commented on the number of
impaired waters in the City of Victoria. She said she would rather see the
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District spending money to deal with the
phosphorus and pollution in all the lakes. She questioned why they can't
work cooperatively on things than can make an impact on water rather than
getting in the land business.
Mr. Norton asked which parcels have been purchased.
Mr. Uram said none, there have been two appraisals.
Ms. Geheren talked about the capital improvement
program. She said in the 2007 Minnehaha Creek Watershed District water
resources management plan the total capital project costs was about $7.4
million.
Ms. Geheren showed phase I and phase II of the
Wasserman Lake wetland restoration project.
Ms. Geheren stated a feasibility study was recently
completed and the estimated cost is $624,000 which would result in a
reduction of about 20lbs of phosphorus.
Ms. Geheren reviewed the Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District lakes total maximum daily load study. She explained the City of
Victoria has nine lakes that are currently listed as impaired or polluted.
She said the three impaired lakes included in the study are: Parley Lake,
Wassermann Lake and Lake Virginia.
Ms. Geheren referred to the map and said the area in
pink is where phosphorus reduction is needed. She said 470lbs of
phosphorus reduction is needed per year. She noted the majority of the
reduction is needed in the amount of phosphorus already in the lake. Ms.
Geheren explained that the project identified would only get rid of 19lbs
per year. She stated the phosphorus already in the lake must be addressed
to clean up the lake.
Councilmember Roden asked if part of the problem is
sharing information. Ms. Geheren said the programs are separate with
separate goals.
Councilmember Roden said she thinks it looks like it
is a developer in search of cash to develop property at a faster pace. She
stated it looks like a market place transaction that is dressed up as a
conservation project. Councilmember Roden said she is very uncomfortable
with this as a tax payer and doesn't want money in that business.
Ms. Kreft provided an update on the regulatory
program. She said there are three rules that are left to be updated by the
board. She noted the increased buffer widths are still on the table. Ms.
Kreft explained Rule F is the Shoreline Stabilization. She said there
would be significant impacts to lakeshore homeowners and a permit would be
required for any vegetation removal. Councilmember Roden clarified that
the DNR already does this. Ms. Kreft said yes, the district rules would be
another layer. Councilmember Roden questioned why the same thing needs to
be done with another governmental agency. She asked who pays for it. Ms.
Kreft noted that Rule F would not deal with in-lake. She said the permit
for tree removal would also be duplicated.
Ms. Kreft explained Rule N is the Stormwater
Management. She said at this point the rule will not have any impact to
linear projects. She noted the district is reviewing if there would be
impacts to single-family homes. Ms. Kreft stated the district board has
indicated that they do not want to regulate single-family homes but would
offer incentive programs.
Ms. Geheren talked about the need for improved
communication.
Mr. Uram reviewed the structure of the district budget
general fund and management planning fund. He noted the amount from
Victoria in 2009 was about $170,000. He said the bulk of the funding comes
from Hennepin County.
Mr. Uram provided a summary of the joint meeting. He
said there are two items on the agenda; the mutual effort for protection
of the natural resources and the second is to improve stakeholder
communications. He stated the district has requested that a facilitator be
hired to manage the meeting. Mayor Hershberger Thun noted the district
would pay for the facilitator. Councilmember Roden said it sounds like a
feel good meeting. She said she doesn't see how that meeting will answer
her six questions. Councilmember Roden said a useful meeting would be one
with the elected officials submitting questions in advance. She stated she
expected an outcome from the meeting. She said they should not avoid
dealing with the conflict and issues and everything should be on the
record.
Councilmember O'Connor asked if there would be a
potential resolution reached with the land conservation. Mr. Uram said
they would work cooperatively and try to reach a consensus.
Mayor Hershberger Thun stated she is not supportive of
this meeting and never have been. She said she thinks the questions should
be given to Mr. Uram and the board should provide answers. She said it
needs to be clearly stated that the City Council wants answers to their
questions.
Mayor Hershberger Thun said the feeling of the
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District is that they have the right to acquire
land. She said they believe they can offer additional resources.
Mayor Hershberger Thun said the council members don't
need to meet on a communications plan and that subject should be between
staff.
Mayor Hershberger Thun stated she is not interested in
a battle with two public bodies.
Mr. Uram said there is a concern about land
acquisition in the City of Victoria and they need to have the discussion
on how to move forward.
Councilmember O'Connor stated just because the
district has the right to buy land doesn't mean they should do it.
Councilmember Paulsen commented on the boards
meetings. He said they are not on cable and there is no local press
coverage.
The City Council discussed what they want to get out
of the meeting. They said questions should be submitted from both the City
Council and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Board and then a
meeting should be scheduled.
(3) ADJOURNMENT:
The workshop adjourned at 6:32 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Tanya Schmieg
Recording Secretary
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
|